The documentation on asm statements suggests asm is always a GNU extension, but it's been part of ISO C++ since the first standard.
The documentation of -fno-asm is wrong for C++ as it states that it only affects typeof, but actually it affects typeof and asm (despite asm being part of ISO C++). gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/extend.texi (Basic Asm): Clarify that asm is not an extension in C++. * doc/invoke.texi (-fno-asm): Fix description for C++. OK for trunk?
commit 0321c56153d385fda25ada73ca4e474358d7ec9c Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> Date: Wed Oct 20 12:46:29 2021 doc: Fix documentation around 'asm' keyword in C++ The documentation on asm statements suggests asm is always a GNU extension, but it's been part of ISO C++ since the first standard. The documentation of -fno-asm is wrong for C++ as it states that it only affects typeof, but actually it affects typeof and asm (despite asm being part of ISO C++). gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/extend.texi (Basic Asm): Clarify that asm is not an extension in C++. * doc/invoke.texi (-fno-asm): Fix description for C++. diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi index 3c942d81c32..62280f6e00b 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -9728,10 +9728,12 @@ A basic @code{asm} statement has the following syntax: asm @var{asm-qualifiers} ( @var{AssemblerInstructions} ) @end example -The @code{asm} keyword is a GNU extension. -When writing code that can be compiled with @option{-ansi} and the -various @option{-std} options, use @code{__asm__} instead of -@code{asm} (@pxref{Alternate Keywords}). +For the C language, the @code{asm} keyword is a GNU extension. +When writing C code that can be compiled with @option{-ansi} and the +@option{-std} options that select a base standard, use @code{__asm__} +instead of @code{asm} (@pxref{Alternate Keywords}). For the C++ +language, @code{asm} is a standard keyword, but @code{__asm__} can +be used for code compiled with @option{-fno-asm}. @subsubheading Qualifiers @table @code diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi index c93d822431f..6d1e328571a 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi @@ -2485,14 +2485,14 @@ supported for C as this construct is allowed by C++. Do not recognize @code{asm}, @code{inline} or @code{typeof} as a keyword, so that code can use these words as identifiers. You can use the keywords @code{__asm__}, @code{__inline__} and @code{__typeof__} -instead. @option{-ansi} implies @option{-fno-asm}. +instead. In C, @option{-ansi} implies @option{-fno-asm}. -In C++, this switch only affects the @code{typeof} keyword, since -@code{asm} and @code{inline} are standard keywords. You may want to -use the @option{-fno-gnu-keywords} flag instead, which has the same -effect. In C99 mode (@option{-std=c99} or @option{-std=gnu99}), this -switch only affects the @code{asm} and @code{typeof} keywords, since -@code{inline} is a standard keyword in ISO C99. +In C++, @code{inline} is a standard keyword and is not affected by +this switch. You may want to use the @option{-fno-gnu-keywords} flag +instead, which disables @code{typeof} but not @code{asm} and +@code{inline}. In C99 mode (@option{-std=c99} or @option{-std=gnu99}), +this switch only affects the @code{asm} and @code{typeof} keywords, +since @code{inline} is a standard keyword in ISO C99. @item -fno-builtin @itemx -fno-builtin-@var{function}