Hi,

As the discussions and the testing result under the main thread, this
patch would be safe.

Ping for this:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/580357.html

BR,
Kewen

on 2021/9/28 下午4:13, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> As the discussion in PR102347, currently builtin_decl is invoked so
> early, it's when making up the function_decl for builtin functions,
> at that time the rs6000_builtin_mask could be wrong for those
> builtins sitting in #pragma/attribute target functions, though it
> will be updated properly later when LTO processes all nodes.
> 
> This patch is to align with the practice i386 port adopts, also
> align with r10-7462 by relaxing builtin mask checking in some places.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regress-tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and
> powerpc64-linux-gnu P8.
> 
> Is it ok for trunk?
> 
> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR target/102347
>       * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (rs6000_builtin_decl): Remove builtin
>       mask check.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR target/102347
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/pr102347.c: New test.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c             | 14 ++++----------
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr102347.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr102347.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c
> index fd7f24da818..15e0e09c07d 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c
> @@ -13775,23 +13775,17 @@ rs6000_init_builtins (void)
>      }
>  }
> 
> -/* Returns the rs6000 builtin decl for CODE.  */
> +/* Returns the rs6000 builtin decl for CODE.  Note that we don't check
> +   the builtin mask here since there could be some #pragma/attribute
> +   target functions and the rs6000_builtin_mask could be wrong when
> +   this checking happens, though it will be updated properly later.  */
> 
>  tree
>  rs6000_builtin_decl (unsigned code, bool initialize_p ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>  {
> -  HOST_WIDE_INT fnmask;
> -
>    if (code >= RS6000_BUILTIN_COUNT)
>      return error_mark_node;
> 
> -  fnmask = rs6000_builtin_info[code].mask;
> -  if ((fnmask & rs6000_builtin_mask) != fnmask)
> -    {
> -      rs6000_invalid_builtin ((enum rs6000_builtins)code);
> -      return error_mark_node;
> -    }
> -
>    return rs6000_builtin_decls[code];
>  }
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr102347.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr102347.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..05c439a8dac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr102347.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* { dg-do link } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target power10_ok } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */
> +/* { dg-options "-flto -mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +
> +/* Verify there are no error messages in LTO mode.  */
> +
> +#pragma GCC target "cpu=power10"
> +int main ()
> +{
> +  float *b;
> +  __vector_quad c;
> +  __builtin_mma_disassemble_acc (b, &c);
> +  return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.27.0
> 

Reply via email to