Committed as r12-4494. Thanks to all of you. Gui Haochen
On 15/10/2021 上午 2:53, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:17 AM HAO CHEN GUI <guih...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:Hi, The patch optimizes the code generation for vec_xl_sext builtin. Now all the sign extensions are done on VSX registers directly. Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot. I refined the patch according to Bill and David's advice. I put the patch.diff and ChangeLog in attachment also in case the indentation doesn't show correctly in email body. ChangeLog 2021-10-11 Haochen Gui <guih...@linux.ibm.com> gcc/ * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (altivec_expand_lxvr_builtin): Modify the expansion for sign extension. All extensions are done within VSX registers. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/powerpc/p10_vec_xl_sext.c: New test.This is okay. Thanks, David
