On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:05:29PM +0100, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> On 14/10/2021 1:47 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > What I still miss is tests for the (proc_name : variant_name) syntax
> > in places where proc_name : is optional, but is supplied and is valid, like
> > e.g. in interface, or in subroutine/function and where proc_name specifies
> > the name of the containing interface or subroutine/function.
> > I see that syntax tested in some places with dg-error on that line and
> > in spaces where it isn't optional (e.g. at module scope before contains).
> > But if you want, that can be added incrementally.
>
> Do you mean something like these tests?
Yeah, LGTM, thanks.
Jakub
