Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Certainly no objections to it - in fact I'd suggest it for 4.6 as well. > > The backport is fine, if someone wants to do the work. Just let it bake a = > little in the top of the tree as usual first.
I've already checked the patch in to 4.6 too -- the tests newly enabled by it all pass there as well. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE ulrich.weig...@de.ibm.com
