On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:07:49PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 10/11/21 11:43 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >I also am okay with this. If it was decided x86 does not have to deal > >with these (generic!) problems, then why should we do other people's > >work? > > I don't know that anything was decided.
It was approved though :-) I don't know all history behind it. > I think those changes > were made in haste, and (as you noted in your review of these > updates to them), were incomplete (missing comments referencing > the underlying bugs or limitations). Yeah. > Now that we've noticed it > we should try to fix it. I'm not expecting you (or Kwen) to do > other people's work, but it would help to let them/us know that > there is work for us to do. I only noticed the problem by luck. There is still a month of stage 1 to go, and we are getting >50 new fails every day. Maybe once that dies down we can report anything :-( Segher
