Hi! On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 09:49:19AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > Coming back to the xfail conditionals, do you think you'll > be able to put together some target-supports magic so they > don't have to enumerate all the affected targets?
There should only be an xfail if we do not expect to be able to fix the bug causing this any time soon. There shouldn't be one here, not yet anyway. Other than that: yes, and one you have such a selector, just dg-require it (or its inverse) for this test, don't xfail the test (if this is expected and correct behaviour). Segher
