Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> writes: > Hi, > > So let’s ignore the questions for now - OK for the non-Darwin parts of the > patch ?
Looks OK to me. Thanks, Richard > >> On 24 Sep 2021, at 17:57, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote: >> > >> as noted below the non-Darwin parts of this are trivial (and a no-OP). >> I’d like to apply this to start work towards solving Darwin’s libgcc issues, > >>> On 20 Sep 2021, at 09:25, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote: >>> > >>> The non-Darwin part of this patch is trivial but raises a couple of >>> questions >>> >>> A/ >>> We define builtins to support emulated TLS. >>> These are defined with void * pointers >>> The implementation (in libgcc) uses the correct type (struct >>> __emutls_object *) >>> in both a forward declaration of the functions and in thier eventual >>> implementation. >>> >>> This leads to a (long-standing, nothing new) complaint at build-time about >>> the mismatch in the builtin/implementation decls. >>> >>> AFAICT, there’s no way to fix that unless we introduce struct >>> __emutls_object * >>> as a built-in type? >>> >>> B/ >>> It seems that a consequence of the mismatch in decls means that if I apply >>> attributes to the decl (in the implementation file), they are ignored and I >>> have >>> to apply them to the definition in order for this to work. >>> >>> This (B) is what the patch below does. >>> >>> tested on powerpc,i686,x86_64-darwin, x86_64-linux >>> OK for master? >>> thanks, >>> Iain >>> >>> If the current situation is that A or B indicates “there’s a bug”, please >>> could that >>> be considered as distinct from the current patch (which doesn’t alter this >>> in any >>> way) so that we can make progress on fixing Darwin libgcc issues. >>> >>> ===== commit log >>> >>> In order to better support use of the emulated TLS between objects with >>> DSO dependencies and static-linked libgcc, allow a target to make weak >>> definitions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> >>> >>> libgcc/ChangeLog: >>> >>> * config.host: Add weak-defined emutls crt. >>> * config/t-darwin: Build weak-defined emutls objects. >>> * emutls.c (__emutls_get_address): Add optional attributes. >>> (__emutls_register_common): Likewise. >>> (EMUTLS_ATTR): New. >>> --- >>> libgcc/config.host | 2 +- >>> libgcc/config/t-darwin | 13 +++++++++++++ >>> libgcc/emutls.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- >>> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/libgcc/config.host b/libgcc/config.host >>> index 6c34b13d611..a447ac7ae30 100644 >>> --- a/libgcc/config.host >>> +++ b/libgcc/config.host >>> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ case ${host} in >>> *-*-darwin*) >>> asm_hidden_op=.private_extern >>> tmake_file="$tmake_file t-darwin ${cpu_type}/t-darwin t-libgcc-pic >>> t-slibgcc-darwin" >>> - extra_parts="crt3.o libd10-uwfef.a crttms.o crttme.o" >>> + extra_parts="crt3.o libd10-uwfef.a crttms.o crttme.o libemutls_w.a" >>> ;; >>> *-*-dragonfly*) >>> tmake_file="$tmake_file t-crtstuff-pic t-libgcc-pic t-eh-dw2-dip" >>> diff --git a/libgcc/config/t-darwin b/libgcc/config/t-darwin >>> index 14ae6b35a4e..d6f688d66d5 100644 >>> --- a/libgcc/config/t-darwin >>> +++ b/libgcc/config/t-darwin >>> @@ -15,6 +15,19 @@ crttme.o: $(srcdir)/config/darwin-crt-tm.c >>> LIB2ADDEH = $(srcdir)/unwind-dw2.c $(srcdir)/config/unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c >>> \ >>> $(srcdir)/unwind-sjlj.c $(srcdir)/unwind-c.c >>> >>> +# Make emutls weak so that we can deal with -static-libgcc, override the >>> +# hidden visibility when this is present in libgcc_eh. >>> +emutls.o: HOST_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS += \ >>> + -DEMUTLS_ATTR='__attribute__((__weak__,__visibility__("default")))' >>> +emutls_s.o: HOST_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS += \ >>> + -DEMUTLS_ATTR='__attribute__((__weak__,__visibility__("default")))' >>> + >>> +# Make the emutls crt as a convenience lib so that it can be linked >>> +# optionally, use the shared version so that we can link with DSO. >>> +libemutls_w.a: emutls_s.o >>> + $(AR_CREATE_FOR_TARGET) $@ $< >>> + $(RANLIB_FOR_TARGET) $@ >>> + >>> # Patch to __Unwind_Find_Enclosing_Function for Darwin10. >>> d10-uwfef.o: $(srcdir)/config/darwin10-unwind-find-enc-func.c >>> $(crt_compile) -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -c $< >>> diff --git a/libgcc/emutls.c b/libgcc/emutls.c >>> index ed2658170f5..d553a74728f 100644 >>> --- a/libgcc/emutls.c >>> +++ b/libgcc/emutls.c >>> @@ -50,7 +50,16 @@ struct __emutls_array >>> void **data[]; >>> }; >>> >>> +/* EMUTLS_ATTR is provided to allow targets to build the emulated tls >>> + routines as weak definitions, for example. >>> + If there is no definition, fall back to the default. */ >>> +#ifndef EMUTLS_ATTR >>> +# define EMUTLS_ATTR >>> +#endif >>> + >>> +EMUTLS_ATTR >>> void *__emutls_get_address (struct __emutls_object *); >>> +EMUTLS_ATTR >>> void __emutls_register_common (struct __emutls_object *, word, word, void >>> *); >>> >>> #ifdef __GTHREADS >>> @@ -123,7 +132,11 @@ emutls_alloc (struct __emutls_object *obj) >>> return ret; >>> } >>> >>> -void * >>> +/* Despite applying the attribute to the declaration, in this case the mis- >>> + match between the builtin's declaration [void * (*)(void *)] and the >>> + implementation here, causes the decl. attributes to be discarded. */ >>> + >>> +EMUTLS_ATTR void * >>> __emutls_get_address (struct __emutls_object *obj) >>> { >>> if (! __gthread_active_p ()) >>> @@ -187,7 +200,7 @@ __emutls_get_address (struct __emutls_object *obj) >>> #endif >>> } >>> >>> -void >>> +EMUTLS_ATTR void >>> __emutls_register_common (struct __emutls_object *obj, >>> word size, word align, void *templ) >>> { >>> -- >>> >>