Hello Jeff, > I would strongly recommend removing all the documentation related to > single tree builds.
Two questions: (1) When you say "all", are you suggesting that in-the-gcc-tree builds of gmp, mpfr, mpc, and isl should no longer be documented? Or only in-tree builds of binutils? (2) Is there any truth to the suggestion (found in some google tracks) that when building a cross-compiler, it is easier to build binutils in the same tree? For example https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Building_Cross_Toolchains_with_gcc https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/simtest-howto.html https://stackoverflow.com/a/6228588 It is out of respect for existing user habit that I proposed merely demoting it to an "alternative" method (while "recommending" the separate build). -john
