Here since uses_template_parms returns true for all concept-ids, when a
concept-id is used as a default template argument then during deduction
the default argument is considered dependent even after substitution,
which leads to deduction failure (from type_unification_real).

This patch fixes this by implementing the proposed resolution of CWG 2446
which says a concept-id is dependent only if its arguments are.

Bootstrapped and regtestedon x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 11?  Also tested on cmcstl2 and range-v3.

        DR 2446
        PR c++/102412

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression)
        <case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR>: Check value_dependent_expression_p
        instead of processing_template_decl.
        * pt.c (value_dependent_expression_p) <case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR>:
        Return true only if any_dependent_template_arguments_p.
        (instantiation_dependent_r) <case CALL_EXPR>: Remove this case.
        <case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR>: Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep2.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep3.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.c                            |  2 +-
 gcc/cp/pt.c                                   | 15 ++-----------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep2.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep3.C |  9 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep2.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep3.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index 8a5dd067bcb..18d9d117a48 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -7117,7 +7117,7 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, 
tree t,
            break;
          }
 
-       if (!processing_template_decl
+       if (!value_dependent_expression_p (t)
            && !uid_sensitive_constexpr_evaluation_p ())
          r = evaluate_concept_check (t);
        else
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 22c74da7935..17386286269 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -27191,7 +27191,8 @@ value_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)
       }
 
     case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR:
-      return concept_definition_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 0));
+      return concept_definition_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 0))
+       && any_dependent_template_arguments_p (TREE_OPERAND (expression, 1));
 
     case CONSTRUCTOR:
       {
@@ -27598,18 +27599,6 @@ instantiation_dependent_r (tree *tp, int 
*walk_subtrees,
     case REQUIRES_EXPR:
       return *tp;
 
-    case CALL_EXPR:
-      /* Treat concept checks as dependent. */
-      if (concept_check_p (*tp))
-        return *tp;
-      break;
-
-    case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR:
-      /* Treat concept checks as dependent.  */
-      if (concept_check_p (*tp))
-       return *tp;
-      break;
-
     case CONSTRUCTOR:
       if (CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DEPENDENT (*tp))
        return *tp;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep2.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e9867f825a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/102412
+// { dg-do link { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T, class U> concept C = __is_same(T, U);
+
+template<class T, bool = C<int, T>> void f();
+template<> void f<int, true>() { }
+template<> void f<char, false>() { }
+
+template<bool = C<int, char>> void g();
+template<> void g<false>() { }
+
+template<bool = C<int, int>> void h();
+template<> void h<true>() { }
+
+int main() {
+  f<int>();
+  f<char>();
+  g();
+  h();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep3.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ec2d60a43b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nondep3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// DR 2446
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template <typename T> concept C = true;
+template <typename T> struct A;
+template <> struct A<bool> { using type = bool; };
+
+template <typename T>
+void f(A<decltype(C<T>)>::type); // OK: no 'typename' needed
-- 
2.33.0.363.g4c719308ce

Reply via email to