This test is derived from the one provided in the PR: it is a
compile-only test because I do not have access to anything that could
execute it. We can switch it do 'dg-do run' later, however it would
be better to write a new executable test to ensure coverage in case
the tester cannot execute such code (and it will need a new
arm_v8_1m_mve_hw or similar effective-target).
2021-09-01 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@foss.st.com>
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/101325
* gcc.target/arm/simd/pr101325.c: New.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr101325.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr101325.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a466683a0b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/pr101325.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_1m_mve_ok } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O3" } */
+
+#include <arm_mve.h>
+
+unsigned foo(int8x16_t v, int8x16_t w)
+{
+ return vcmpeqq (v, w);
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tvcmp.i8 eq} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tvmrs\t r[0-9]+, P0} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tuxth} } } */
--
2.25.1
