On 23/08/2021 12:10, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Christophe LYON <christophe.l...@foss.st.com>
Sent: 23 August 2021 10:41
To: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix __arm_vctp16q return type in arm_mve.h
On 23/08/2021 11:30, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-
bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm....@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of
Christophe
Lyon via Gcc-patches
Sent: 16 August 2021 14:13
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix __arm_vctp16q return type in arm_mve.h
__arm_vctp16q actually returns mve_pred16_t rather than int64_t.
Ok. Does this need a backport?
Good point. I think so: branches gcc-10 and gcc-11 are affected, gcc-9
did not support MVE yet.
Ok, please backport it wherever it's needed.
Thanks,
Kyrill
Thanks, committed to trunk, gcc-11 and gcc-10.
Christophe
Thanks,
Kyrill
2021-08-16 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@foss.st.com>
gcc/
* config/arm/arm_mve.h: Fix __arm_vctp16q return type.
---
gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
index 83f10036990..e04d46218d0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
@@ -3524,7 +3524,7 @@ __arm_vaddlvq_u32 (uint32x4_t __a)
return __builtin_mve_vaddlvq_uv4si (__a);
}
-__extension__ extern __inline int64_t
+__extension__ extern __inline mve_pred16_t
__attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
__arm_vctp16q (uint32_t __a)
{
--
2.25.1
