Since (template) argument passing is a copy-initialization context, we mustn't consider explicit deduction guides when deducing a CTAD placeholder type of an NTTP.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/11? PR c++/101883 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.c (convert_template_argument): Pass LOOKUP_IMPLICIT to convert_template_argument. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class49.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/pt.c | 3 ++- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class49.C | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class49.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c index 0870ccdc9f6..5ac89901e22 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -8486,7 +8486,8 @@ convert_template_argument (tree parm, can happen in the context of -fnew-ttp-matching. */; else if (tree a = type_uses_auto (t)) { - t = do_auto_deduction (t, arg, a, complain, adc_unify, args); + t = do_auto_deduction (t, arg, a, complain, adc_unify, args, + LOOKUP_IMPLICIT); if (t == error_mark_node) return error_mark_node; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class49.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class49.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c83e4075ed0 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class49.C @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +// PR c++/101883 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +template<class T> struct C { constexpr C(int) { } }; +explicit C(int) -> C<int>; + +template<C c> struct X { }; +X<1> x; // { dg-error "deduction|no match" } -- 2.33.0.rc1