Hello.

Currently, the IPA ICF pass optimistically assumes that SSA NAMES do match.
It's fine, but we should match SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF, otherwise we get
the verification error where a pair of SSA_NAMEs is equal, but hash values
do differ.

Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.

Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin

        PR ipa/100600

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compare_ssa_name): Do not
          consider equal SSA_NAMEs when one is a param.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.dg/ipa/pr100600.c: New test.
---
 gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c                |  3 +++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr100600.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr100600.c

diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c b/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c
index edf5f025627..cf0262621be 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-icf-gimple.c
@@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ func_checker::compare_ssa_name (const_tree t1, const_tree t2)
   unsigned i1 = SSA_NAME_VERSION (t1);
   unsigned i2 = SSA_NAME_VERSION (t2);
+ if (SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (t1) != SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (t2))
+    return false;
+
   if (m_source_ssa_names[i1] == -1)
     m_source_ssa_names[i1] = i2;
   else if (m_source_ssa_names[i1] != (int) i2)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr100600.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr100600.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8a3d0e16e7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr100600.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/* PR ipa/100600 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+int a, b, c;
+long d(long x, long e, long f, long g) {
+  long h, i;
+  for (; h < e; h++) {
+    i = f;
+    for (; i < g; i++)
+      c = b + a;
+  }
+  return h + i;
+}
+
+long j(long x, long e, long y, long g) {
+  long h, i;
+  for (; h < e; h++)
+    for (; i < g; i++)
+      c = b + a;
+  return h + i;
+}
--
2.32.0

Reply via email to