On 8/12/2021 8:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 11:48 AM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
At this point I don't see any use for the legacy mode, which I had
originally left in place during the transition.
This patch removes the legacy back threader, and cleans up the code a
bit. There are no functional changes to the non-legacy code.
Tested on x86-64 Linux.
OK?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi: Remove docs for threader-mode param.
* flag-types.h (enum threader_mode): Remove.
* params.opt: Remove threader-mode param.
* tree-ssa-threadbackward.c (class back_threader): Remove
path_is_unreachable_p.
Make find_paths private.
Add maybe_thread and thread_through_all_blocks.
Remove reference marker for m_registry.
Remove reference marker for m_profit.
(back_threader::back_threader): Adjust for registry and profit not
being references.
(dump_path): Move down.
(debug): Move down.
(class thread_jumps): Remove.
(class back_threader_registry): Remove m_all_paths.
Remove destructor.
(thread_jumps::thread_through_all_blocks): Move to back_threader
class.
(fsm_find_thread_path): Remove
(back_threader::maybe_thread): New.
(back_threader::thread_through_all_blocks): Move from
thread_jumps.
(back_threader_registry::back_threader_registry): Remove
m_all_paths.
(back_threader_registry::~back_threader_registry): Remove.
(thread_jumps::find_taken_edge): Remove.
(thread_jumps::check_subpath_and_update_thread_path): Remove.
(thread_jumps::maybe_register_path): Remove.
(thread_jumps::handle_phi): Remove.
(handle_assignment_p): Remove.
(thread_jumps::handle_assignment): Remove.
(thread_jumps::fsm_find_control_statement_thread_paths): Remove.
(thread_jumps::find_jump_threads_backwards): Remove.
(thread_jumps::find_jump_threads_backwards_with_ranger): Remove.
(try_thread_blocks): Rename find_jump_threads_backwards to
maybe_thread.
(pass_early_thread_jumps::execute): Same.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-7.c: Remove call into the legacy
code and adjust for ranger threader.
SOrry, I thought I'd already pre-approved this :-)
OK
jeff