On 8/12/21 4:51 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 7:39 AM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:

On 8/12/21 4:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Please send out the v2 patch with the enclosed patch.  I added some tests.

Thanks, there's patch which includes your changes.

Martin

diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-isas.h
b/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-isas.h
index 898c18f3dda..cd9523b8fbc 100644
--- a/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-isas.h
+++ b/gcc/common/config/i386/i386-isas.h
@@ -169,4 +169,8 @@ ISA_NAMES_TABLE_START
    ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("aeskle", FEATURE_AESKLE, P_NONE, NULL)
    ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("widekl", FEATURE_WIDEKL, P_NONE, "-mwidekl")
    ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("avxvnni", FEATURE_AVXVNNI, P_NONE, "-mavxvnni")
+  ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("x86-64", FEATURE_X86_64_BASELINE, P_NONE, NULL)
+  ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("x86-64-v2", FEATURE_X86_64_V2, P_NONE, NULL)
+  ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("x86-64-v3", FEATURE_X86_64_V3, P_NONE, NULL)
+  ISA_NAMES_TABLE_ENTRY("x86-64-v4", FEATURE_X86_64_V4, P_NONE, NULL)

If they have proper feature_priority, can you avoid

I don't think so. First we likely want supporting "arch=x86-64-v3" rather than
"x86-64-v3" in e.g. 'target' attribute. That means a special handling by the 
code
I added.

The following fails as there's no corresponding -m$option.

pr101696.c:5:45: error: attribute ‘x86-64-v4’ argument ‘target’ is unknown

    5 | __attribute__ ((target ("x86-64-v4"))) void foo () {  __builtin_printf 
("arch=x86-64-v4\n"); }

      |                                             ^~~


Or do I miss something and we can do it in a simpler way?

Cheers,
Martin


iff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c
index 204e2903126..492873bb076 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c
@@ -1904,8 +1904,24 @@ get_builtin_code_for_version (tree decl, tree
*predicate_list)
   return 0;
        new_target = TREE_TARGET_OPTION (target_node);
        gcc_assert (new_target);
-
-      if (new_target->arch_specified && new_target->arch > 0)
+      enum ix86_builtins builtin_fn = IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_IS;
+
+      /* Special case x86-64 micro-level architectures.  */
+      const char *arch_name = attrs_str + strlen ("arch=");
+      if (startswith (arch_name, "x86-64"))
+ {
+   arg_str = arch_name;
+   builtin_fn = IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_SUPPORTS;
+   if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64") == 0)
+     priority = P_X86_64_BASELINE;
+   else if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64-v2") == 0)
+     priority = P_X86_64_V2;
+   else if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64-v3") == 0)
+     priority = P_X86_64_V3;
+   else if (strcmp (arch_name, "x86-64-v4") == 0)
+     priority = P_X86_64_V4;
+ }

        if (predicate_list)
   {
-          predicate_decl = ix86_builtins [(int) IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_IS];
+   predicate_decl = ix86_builtins [(int) builtin_fn];

Is this required?


Reply via email to