On 8/10/21 4:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!

The spaceship-synth-neg6.C testcase ICEs because we call cat_tag_for
on the explicit return type, but pointer types don't have
TYPE_LINKAGE_IDENTIFIER.  The patch fixes that.
Or should I be checking for if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type)) return cc_last;
instead (are class type guaranteed to have TYPE_LINKAGE_IDENTIFIER?)?

I also wonder if after finding a match we shouldn't verify if is
a class type in std namespace (i.e. that
TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type)) is a TYPE_DECL
and
decl_in_std_namespace_p (TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type)))
because it seems nothing prevents it from returning non-cc_last say on
namespace N {
   struct partial_ordering {};
}
etc.

Checking CLASS_TYPE_P && decl_in_std_namespace (TYPE_MAIN_DECL) before looking at the name makes sense to me.

The g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth11.C testcase is from a PR that has been
fixed with r12-619-gfc178519771db508c03611cff4a1466cf67fce1d (but
not backported to 11).

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.

2021-08-10  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

gcc/cp/
        PR c++/94162
        * method.c (cat_tag_for): Return cc_last for types with no
        linkage identifier.
gcc/testsuite/
        PR c++/99429
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth11.C: New test.

        PR c++/94162
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth-neg6.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/method.c.jj  2021-06-25 10:36:22.169019953 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/method.c     2021-08-09 12:26:38.590166006 +0200
@@ -1029,6 +1029,8 @@ is_cat (tree type, comp_cat_tag tag)
  static comp_cat_tag
  cat_tag_for (tree type)
  {
+  if (!TYPE_LINKAGE_IDENTIFIER (type))
+    return cc_last;
    for (int i = 0; i < cc_last; ++i)
      {
        comp_cat_tag tag = (comp_cat_tag)i;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth11.C.jj   2021-08-09 
12:28:58.748240310 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth11.C      2021-08-09 
12:29:44.023618250 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// PR c++/99429
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+namespace std {
+struct strong_ordering {
+  int _v;
+  constexpr strong_ordering (int v) :_v(v) {}
+  constexpr operator int (void) const { return _v; }
+  static const strong_ordering less;
+  static const strong_ordering equal;
+  static const strong_ordering greater;
+};
+constexpr strong_ordering strong_ordering::less = -1;
+constexpr strong_ordering strong_ordering::equal = 0;
+constexpr strong_ordering strong_ordering::greater = 1;
+}
+
+template <unsigned long N>
+struct duration {
+  static constexpr const long period = N;
+  constexpr duration (void) = default;
+  constexpr duration (const duration& d) = default;
+  constexpr bool operator== (const duration& d) const = default;
+  constexpr bool operator<=> (const duration& d) const = default;
+  long _d;
+};
+
+using nanoseconds = duration<1>;
+using microseconds = duration<nanoseconds::period * 1000>;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth-neg6.C.jj        2021-08-09 
12:31:47.411922957 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/spaceship-synth-neg6.C   2021-08-09 
12:35:26.995906403 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/94162
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+#include <compare>
+
+struct S {
+  int a;                       // { dg-error "three-way comparison of 'S::a' has 
type 'std::strong_ordering', which does not convert to 'int\\*'" }
+  int *operator<=>(const S&) const = default;
+};
+
+bool b = S{} < S{};         // { dg-error "use of deleted function 'constexpr int\\* 
S::operator<=>\\\(const S&\\\) const'" }

        Jakub


Reply via email to