On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 6:56 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1. Update x86 STORE_MAX_PIECES to use OImode and XImode only if inter-unit
> move is enabled since x86 uses vec_duplicate, which is enabled only when
> inter-unit move is enabled, to implement store_by_pieces.
> 2. Update op_by_pieces_d::op_by_pieces_d to set m_max_size to
> STORE_MAX_PIECES for store_by_pieces and to COMPARE_MAX_PIECES for
> compare_by_pieces.
>
> gcc/
>
>         PR target/101742
>         * expr.c (op_by_pieces_d::op_by_pieces_d): Set m_max_size to
>         STORE_MAX_PIECES for store_by_pieces and to COMPARE_MAX_PIECES
>         for compare_by_pieces.
>         * config/i386/i386.h (STORE_MAX_PIECES): Use OImode and XImode
>         only if TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC is true.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
>         PR target/101742
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.h                    | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  gcc/expr.c                                |  6 +++++-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c |  4 ++++
>  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
> index bed9cd9da18..9b416abd5f4 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
> @@ -1783,15 +1783,17 @@ typedef struct ix86_args {
>  /* STORE_MAX_PIECES is the number of bytes at a time that we can
>     store efficiently.  */
>  #define STORE_MAX_PIECES \
> -  ((TARGET_AVX512F && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX256) \
> -   ? 64 \
> -   : ((TARGET_AVX \
> -       && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX128 \
> -       && !TARGET_AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_STORE) \
> -      ? 32 \
> -      : ((TARGET_SSE2 \
> -         && TARGET_SSE_UNALIGNED_STORE_OPTIMAL) \
> -        ? 16 : UNITS_PER_WORD)))
> +  (TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC \
> +   ? ((TARGET_AVX512F && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX256) \
> +      ? 64 \
> +      : ((TARGET_AVX \
> +         && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX128 \
> +         && !TARGET_AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_STORE) \
> +         ? 32 \
> +         : ((TARGET_SSE2 \
> +             && TARGET_SSE_UNALIGNED_STORE_OPTIMAL) \
> +             ? 16 : UNITS_PER_WORD))) \
> +   : UNITS_PER_WORD)
>
>  /* If a memory-to-memory move would take MOVE_RATIO or more simple
>     move-instruction pairs, we will do a cpymem or libcall instead.

expr.c has been fixed.   Here is the v2 patch for x86 backend.
OK for master?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.
From 0f8d9c643eb5e74bfc4951bf7d608f40f5f64275 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 06:17:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86: Update STORE_MAX_PIECES

Update STORE_MAX_PIECES to use OImode and XImode only if inter-unit
move is enabled since vec_duplicate enabled by inter-unit move is
used to implement store_by_pieces.

gcc/

	PR target/101742
	* config/i386/i386.h (STORE_MAX_PIECES): Use OImode and XImode
	only if TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC is true.

gcc/testsuite/

	PR target/101742
	* gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c: Likewise.
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386.h                    | 20 +++++++++++---------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
index bed9cd9da18..9b416abd5f4 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
@@ -1783,15 +1783,17 @@ typedef struct ix86_args {
 /* STORE_MAX_PIECES is the number of bytes at a time that we can
    store efficiently.  */
 #define STORE_MAX_PIECES \
-  ((TARGET_AVX512F && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX256) \
-   ? 64 \
-   : ((TARGET_AVX \
-       && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX128 \
-       && !TARGET_AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_STORE) \
-      ? 32 \
-      : ((TARGET_SSE2 \
-	  && TARGET_SSE_UNALIGNED_STORE_OPTIMAL) \
-	 ? 16 : UNITS_PER_WORD)))
+  (TARGET_INTER_UNIT_MOVES_TO_VEC \
+   ? ((TARGET_AVX512F && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX256) \
+      ? 64 \
+      : ((TARGET_AVX \
+	  && !TARGET_PREFER_AVX128 \
+	  && !TARGET_AVX256_SPLIT_UNALIGNED_STORE) \
+	  ? 32 \
+	  : ((TARGET_SSE2 \
+	      && TARGET_SSE_UNALIGNED_STORE_OPTIMAL) \
+	      ? 16 : UNITS_PER_WORD))) \
+   : UNITS_PER_WORD)
 
 /* If a memory-to-memory move would take MOVE_RATIO or more simple
    move-instruction pairs, we will do a cpymem or libcall instead.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..67ea40587dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742a.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O3 -mtune=nano-x2" } */
+
+int n2;
+
+__attribute__ ((simd)) char
+w7 (void)
+{
+  short int xb = n2;
+  int qp;
+
+  for (qp = 0; qp < 2; ++qp)
+    xb = xb < 1;
+
+  return xb;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ba19064077b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr101742b.c
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O3 -mtune=nano-x2 -mtune-ctrl=sse_unaligned_store_optimal" } */
+
+#include "pr101742a.c"
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to