On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 16:23 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 09:11 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Xi Ruoyao <xry...@mengyan1223.wang> writes:
> > > Ping again.
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 11:11 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > > > Commit message shamelessly copied from 1777beb6b129 by jakub:
> > > > 
> > > > This function, because it is sometimes called even outside of
> > > > function
> > > > bodies, uses create_tmp_var_raw rather than create_tmp_var.  But
> > > > in
> > > > order
> > > > for that to work, when first referenced, the VAR_DECLs need to
> > > > appear
> > > > in a
> > > > TARGET_EXPR so that during gimplification the var gets the right
> > > > DECL_CONTEXT and is added to local decls.
> > > > 
> > > > Bootstrapped & regtested on mips64el-linux-gnu.  Ok for trunk
> > > > and
> > > > backport
> > > > to 11, 10, and 9?
> > 
> > OK for all, thanks.
> > 
> > Similar comments to the previous message about the appropriateness
> > of me reviewing the patch, but like you say, this is doing for MIPS
> > what we've already had to do for other targets.
> 
> Thanks for reviewing.
> 
> Will bootstrap and test it again, and commit if there is no
> regressions.

Committed to master at 20656544 and releases/gcc-11 at 7db1795a.

Will do it for gcc-10 and gcc-9 tomorrow.

Reply via email to