Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> writes: > Hi, > > Sorry It looks like I forgot to ask if OK for backport to GCC 9, 10, 11 after > some stew.
Yeah, OK for backports too. Thanks, Richard > > Thanks, > Tamar > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> >> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 7:11 PM >> To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; Richard Earnshaw >> <richard.earns...@arm.com>; Marcus Shawcroft >> <marcus.shawcr...@arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4]AArch64: correct dot-product RTL patterns for >> aarch64. >> >> Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> writes: >> > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues. >> > >> > Ok for master? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tamar >> > >> > gcc/ChangeLog: >> > >> > * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd-builtins.def (sdot, udot): Rename to.. >> > (sdot_prod, udot_prod): ... This. >> > * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (aarch64_<sur>dot<vsi2qi>): >> Merged >> > into... >> > (<sur>dot_prod<vsi2qi>): ... this. >> > (aarch64_<sur>dot_lane<vsi2qi>, aarch64_<sur>dot_laneq<vsi2qi>): >> > Change operands order. >> > (<sur>sadv16qi): Use new operands order. >> > * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vdot_u32, vdotq_u32, vdot_s32, >> > vdotq_s32): Use new RTL ordering. >> >> OK, thanks. >> >> Richard
