On 15/07/2021 11:33, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> Note that the "parent" should be abstract but I don't think dwarf has a >> way to express a fully abstract parent of a concrete instance child - or >> at least how GCC expresses this causes consumers to "misinterpret" >> that. I wonder if adding a DW_AT_declaration to the late DWARF >> emitted "parent" would fix things as well here? > > (I suppose not, Abid?) >
Yes, adding DW_AT_declaration does not fix the problem. -- Hafiz Abid Qadeer Mentor, a Siemens Business
