Ada_2022 introduces the notion of Target_Name, written @, to be used in
assignment statements, where it denotes the value of the left-hand side
prior to the assignment. This patch diagnoses illegal uses of the target
name outside of its legal context.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
gcc/ada/
* sem_ch5.adb (Analyze_Target_Name): Properly reject a
Target_Name when it appears outside of an assignment statement,
or within the left-hand side of one.
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb
@@ -4233,10 +4233,50 @@ package body Sem_Ch5 is
-------------------------
procedure Analyze_Target_Name (N : Node_Id) is
+ procedure Report_Error;
+
+ ------------------
+ -- Report_Error --
+ ------------------
+
+ procedure Report_Error is
+ begin
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("must appear in the right-hand side of an assignment statement",
+ N);
+ Rewrite (N, New_Occurrence_Of (Any_Id, Sloc (N)));
+ end Report_Error;
+
begin
-- A target name has the type of the left-hand side of the enclosing
-- assignment.
+ -- First, verify that the context is the right-hand side of an
+ -- assignment statement.
+
+ if No (Current_Assignment) then
+ Report_Error;
+ return;
+
+ else
+ declare
+ P : Node_Id := N;
+ begin
+ while Present (P)
+ and then Nkind (Parent (P)) /= N_Assignment_Statement
+ loop
+ P := Parent (P);
+ end loop;
+
+ if No (P)
+ or else P /= Expression (Parent (P))
+ then
+ Report_Error;
+ return;
+ end if;
+ end;
+ end if;
+
Set_Etype (N, Etype (Name (Current_Assignment)));
end Analyze_Target_Name;