Hi,
This patch is to add one test case to check if vectorizer
can exploit vector division instrutions newly introduced
by Power10.
Is it ok for trunk?
BR,
Kewen
-----
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/powerpc/div-vectorize-1.c: New test.
---
.../gcc.target/powerpc/div-vectorize-1.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/div-vectorize-1.c
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/div-vectorize-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/div-vectorize-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6208b2dc1f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/div-vectorize-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* { dg-require-effective-target power10_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -O2 -ftree-vectorize
-fno-vect-cost-model -fno-unroll-loops -fdump-tree-vect-details" } */
+
+/* Test vectorizer can exploit ISA 3.1 instructions Vector Divide
+ Signed/Unsigned Word/Doubleword for word/doubleword division. */
+
+#define N 128
+
+extern signed int si_a[N], si_b[N], si_c[N];
+extern unsigned int ui_a[N], ui_b[N], ui_c[N];
+extern signed long long sd_a[N], sd_b[N], sd_c[N];
+extern unsigned long long ud_a[N], ud_b[N], ud_c[N];
+
+__attribute__ ((noipa)) void
+test_si ()
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ si_c[i] = si_a[i] / si_b[i];
+}
+
+__attribute__ ((noipa)) void
+test_ui ()
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ ui_c[i] = ui_a[i] / ui_b[i];
+}
+
+__attribute__ ((noipa)) void
+test_sd ()
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ sd_c[i] = sd_a[i] / sd_b[i];
+}
+
+__attribute__ ((noipa)) void
+test_ud ()
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
+ ud_c[i] = ud_a[i] / ud_b[i];
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 4 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvdivsw\M} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvdivuw\M} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvdivsd\M} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvdivud\M} 1 } } */
--
2.17.1
