On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:18:28AM +0200, Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > 2021-06-20  Roger Sayle  <ro...@nextmovesoftware.com>
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog
> >         PR target/11877
> >         * config/i386/i386.md: New define_peephole2s to shrink writing
> >         1, 2 or 4 consecutive zeros to memory when optimizing for size.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >         PR target/11877
> >         * gcc.target/i386/pr11877.c: New test case.
> 
> OK.

It unfortunately doesn't extend well to larger memory clearing.
Consider e.g.
void
foo (int *p)
{
  p[0] = 0;
  p[7] = 0;
  p[23] = 0;
  p[41] = 0;
  p[48] = 0;
  p[59] = 0;
  p[69] = 0;
  p[78] = 0;
  p[83] = 0;
  p[89] = 0;
  p[98] = 0;
  p[121] = 0;
  p[132] = 0;
  p[143] = 0;
  p[154] = 0;
}
where with the patch we emit:
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        xorl    %edx, %edx
        xorl    %ecx, %ecx
        xorl    %esi, %esi
        xorl    %r8d, %r8d
        movl    %eax, (%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 28(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 92(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 164(%rdi)
        movl    %edx, 192(%rdi)
        movl    %edx, 236(%rdi)
        movl    %edx, 276(%rdi)
        movl    %edx, 312(%rdi)
        movl    %ecx, 332(%rdi)
        movl    %ecx, 356(%rdi)
        movl    %ecx, 392(%rdi)
        movl    %ecx, 484(%rdi)
        movl    %esi, 528(%rdi)
        movl    %esi, 572(%rdi)
        movl    %r8d, 616(%rdi)
Here is an incremental (so far untested) patch that emits:
        xorl    %eax, %eax
        movl    %eax, (%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 28(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 92(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 164(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 192(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 236(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 276(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 312(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 332(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 356(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 392(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 484(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 528(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 572(%rdi)
        movl    %eax, 616(%rdi)
instead:

2021-06-21  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/11877
        * config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p): Declare.
        * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p): New function.
        * config/i386/i386.md (peephole2s for 1/2/4 stores of const0_rtx):
        Remove "" from match_operand.  Add peephole2s for 1/2/4 stores of
        const0_rtx following previous successful peep2s.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386-protos.h.jj    2021-06-07 09:24:57.696690116 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386-protos.h       2021-06-21 10:21:05.428887980 +0200
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ extern bool ix86_use_lea_for_mov (rtx_in
 extern bool ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr (rtx_insn *, rtx[]);
 extern void ix86_split_lea_for_addr (rtx_insn *, rtx[], machine_mode);
 extern bool ix86_lea_for_add_ok (rtx_insn *, rtx[]);
+extern bool ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p (rtx_insn *, rtx);
 extern bool ix86_vec_interleave_v2df_operator_ok (rtx operands[3], bool high);
 extern bool ix86_dep_by_shift_count (const_rtx set_insn, const_rtx use_insn);
 extern bool ix86_agi_dependent (rtx_insn *set_insn, rtx_insn *use_insn);
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c.jj   2021-06-21 09:39:21.622487840 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c      2021-06-21 10:21:12.389794740 +0200
@@ -15186,6 +15186,33 @@ ix86_lea_for_add_ok (rtx_insn *insn, rtx
   return ix86_lea_outperforms (insn, regno0, regno1, regno2, 0, false);
 }
 
+/* Return true if insns before FIRST_INSN (which is of the form
+   (set (memory) (zero_operand)) are all also either in the
+   same form, or (set (zero_operand) (const_int 0)).  */
+
+bool
+ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p (rtx_insn *first_insn, rtx zero_operand)
+{
+  rtx_insn *insn = first_insn;
+  for (int count = 0; count < 512; count++)
+    {
+      insn = prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn_bb (insn);
+      if (!insn) 
+       return false;
+      rtx set = single_set (insn);
+      if (!set)
+       return false;
+      if (SET_SRC (set) == const0_rtx
+         && rtx_equal_p (SET_DEST (set), zero_operand))
+       return true;
+      if (set != PATTERN (insn)
+         || !rtx_equal_p (SET_SRC (set), zero_operand)
+         || !memory_operand (SET_DEST (set), VOIDmode))
+       return false;
+    }
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Return true if destination reg of SET_BODY is shift count of
    USE_BODY.  */
 
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj  2021-06-21 09:42:04.086303699 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md     2021-06-21 10:21:31.932532964 +0200
@@ -19360,10 +19360,10 @@ (define_peephole2
 ;; When optimizing for size, zeroing memory should use a register.
 (define_peephole2
   [(match_scratch:SWI48 0 "r")
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 3 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 4 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))]
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 3 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 4 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))]
   "optimize_insn_for_size_p () && peep2_regno_dead_p (0, FLAGS_REG)"
   [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))
    (set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0))
@@ -19375,8 +19375,8 @@ (define_peephole2
 
 (define_peephole2
   [(match_scratch:SWI48 0 "r")
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))]
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))]
   "optimize_insn_for_size_p () && peep2_regno_dead_p (0, FLAGS_REG)"
   [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))
    (set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0))]
@@ -19386,13 +19386,48 @@ (define_peephole2
 
 (define_peephole2
   [(match_scratch:SWI48 0 "r")
-   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand" "") (const_int 0))]
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))]
   "optimize_insn_for_size_p () && peep2_regno_dead_p (0, FLAGS_REG)"
   [(set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))]
 {
   ix86_expand_clear (operands[0]);
 })
 
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:SWI48 5 "memory_operand")
+       (match_operand:SWI48 0 "general_reg_operand"))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 3 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 4 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))]
+  "optimize_insn_for_size_p ()
+   && ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p (peep2_next_insn (0), operands[0])"
+  [(set (match_dup 5) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 3) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 4) (match_dup 0))])
+
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:SWI48 3 "memory_operand")
+       (match_operand:SWI48 0 "general_reg_operand"))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))]
+  "optimize_insn_for_size_p ()
+   && ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p (peep2_next_insn (0), operands[0])"
+  [(set (match_dup 3) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0))])
+
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:SWI48 2 "memory_operand")
+       (match_operand:SWI48 0 "general_reg_operand"))
+   (set (match_operand:SWI48 1 "memory_operand") (const_int 0))]
+  "optimize_insn_for_size_p ()
+   && ix86_zero_stores_peep2_p (peep2_next_insn (0), operands[0])"
+  [(set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 0))
+   (set (match_dup 1) (match_dup 0))])
+
 ;; Reload dislikes loading constants directly into class_likely_spilled
 ;; hard registers.  Try to tidy things up here.
 (define_peephole2


        Jakub

Reply via email to