On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:30 AM Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:53 PM Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 6/2/21 1:52 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:34 PM Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches > > > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > > > > the case where this only happens after inlining (important for your > > > friendly > > > C++ abstraction hell), and the unreachable()s gone. > > > > I have pointed this out before, and will repeat it in case you missed it: > > > > "Richard, you have made it very clear that we disagree on core design > > issues, but that's no reason to continually make snide comments on every > > patch or PRs Can we keep the discussions focused on the technical bits?" > > You need to stop taking every sentence I write as personal insult. I was > refering to C++ abstraction in general in the sense as that we should be > prepared to handle index checking removal even across inline boundaries. > Reading my comment I guess the "your" might mislead you - sorry for > not being a native speaker and thus picking a wrong general term here. > > Richard. > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/569072.html No, I am only addressing the thinly veiled insults and snide remarks you frequently make. And I will continue to do so if you steer off topic. These are not language or cultural issues so don't try to paint them as such. I am also not a native speaker and do not use it as an excuse for my behavior. Aldy
