On 01/06/21 8:10 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/06/21 18:47 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/06/21 18:45 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/05/21 18:35 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
diff --git
a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/96088.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/96088.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..53bb754dab6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/96088.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+
+// Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+//
+// This file is part of the GNU ISO C++ Library. This library is
free
+// software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
+// terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
+// Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
+// any later version.
+
+// This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+// GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
License along
+// with this library; see the file COPYING3. If not see
+// <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+// libstdc++/96088
+
+#include <string_view>
This is a c++11 test, but it uses <string_view>.
The test fails for make check
RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=unix/-std=gnu++11
I assume it should use { target c++17 } instead?
Same for 23_containers/unordered_map/96088.cc
I've pushed this fix.
Tested x86_64-linux.
I wonder why the same in unordered_multimap/unordered_multiset are not
wrong too.
Thanks
