Hi!

On 2021-02-26T04:34:50-0800, Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.c
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.c
> @@ -2957,6 +2957,8 @@ expand_UNIQUE (internal_fn, gcall *stmt)
>        else
>       gcc_unreachable ();
>        break;
> +    case IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE:
> +      break;
>      }
>
>    if (pattern)

That's unexpected.  Meaning: better if this doesn't happen.

> --- a/gcc/omp-offload.c
> +++ b/gcc/omp-offload.c

> @@ -1998,6 +2133,45 @@ execute_oacc_device_lower ()
>               case IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_TAIL_MARK:
>                 remove = true;
>                 break;
> +
> +             case IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE:
> +               {
> +                 HOST_WIDE_INT level
> +                   = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (call, 2));
> +                 if (level == -1)
> +                   break;

They should be all "handled" here (meaning: also for 'level == -1', do
'remove = true' after the real handling):

> +                 for (unsigned i = 3;
> +                      i < gimple_call_num_args (call);
> +                      i++)
> +                   {
> +                     [...]
> +                   }
> +                 remove = true;
> +               }
> +               break;
>               }
>             break;
>           }

Why we at all can have 'level == -1' cases is a separate bug to be fixed.

I've pushed "[OpenACC privatization] Don't let unhandled
'IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE' linger [PR90115]" to master branch in commit
ff451ea723deb3fe8471eb96ac9381c063ec6533, see attached.


Grüße
 Thomas


-----------------
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 201, 80634 München 
Registergericht München HRB 106955, Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank 
Thürauf
>From ff451ea723deb3fe8471eb96ac9381c063ec6533 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:37:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenACC privatization] Don't let unhandled
 'IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE' linger [PR90115]

Make sure they're all handled in 'execute_oacc_device_lower'.  Why we at all
can have 'level == -1' cases is a separate bug to be fixed.

	gcc/
	PR middle-end/90115
	* omp-offload.c (execute_oacc_device_lower)
	<IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE>: Diagnose and handle for 'level == -1'
	case, too.
	* internal-fn.c (expand_UNIQUE): Don't expect
	'IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE'.
---
 gcc/internal-fn.c |  2 --
 gcc/omp-offload.c | 10 ++++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.c b/gcc/internal-fn.c
index d92080c8077..d209a52f823 100644
--- a/gcc/internal-fn.c
+++ b/gcc/internal-fn.c
@@ -2969,8 +2969,6 @@ expand_UNIQUE (internal_fn, gcall *stmt)
       else
 	gcc_unreachable ();
       break;
-    case IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_PRIVATE:
-      break;
     }
 
   if (pattern)
diff --git a/gcc/omp-offload.c b/gcc/omp-offload.c
index 080bdddfe88..36bd2e44d81 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-offload.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-offload.c
@@ -2139,8 +2139,9 @@ execute_oacc_device_lower ()
 		  {
 		    HOST_WIDE_INT level
 		      = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (call, 2));
-		    if (level == -1)
-		      break;
+		    gcc_checking_assert (level == -1
+					 || (level >= 0
+					     && level < GOMP_DIM_MAX));
 		    for (unsigned i = 3;
 			 i < gimple_call_num_args (call);
 			 i++)
@@ -2156,11 +2157,12 @@ execute_oacc_device_lower ()
 			      { "gang", "worker", "vector" };
 			    fprintf (dump_file, "Decl UID %u has %s "
 				     "partitioning:", DECL_UID (decl),
-				     axes[level]);
+				     (level == -1 ? "UNKNOWN" : axes[level]));
 			    print_generic_decl (dump_file, decl, TDF_SLIM);
 			    fputc ('\n', dump_file);
 			  }
-			if (targetm.goacc.adjust_private_decl)
+			if (level != -1
+			    && targetm.goacc.adjust_private_decl)
 			  {
 			    tree oldtype = TREE_TYPE (decl);
 			    tree newdecl
-- 
2.30.2

Reply via email to