Ping On 4/30/21 8:32 AM, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches wrote: > The problem appears to be triggered by two locations in the front-end > where non-POINTER_SIZE pointers aren't handled right now. > > 1. An assertion in strip_typedefs is triggered because the alignment > of the types don't match. This in turn is caused by creating the new > type with build_pointer_type instead of taking the type of the > original pointer into account. > > 2. An assertion in cp_convert_to_pointer is triggered which expects > the target type to always have POINTER_SIZE. > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64 and s390x. > > Ok for mainline? > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > PR c++/100281 > * cvt.c (cp_convert_to_pointer): Use the size of the target > pointer type. > * tree.c (cp_build_reference_type): Call > cp_build_reference_type_for_mode with VOIDmode. > (cp_build_reference_type_for_mode): Rename from > cp_build_reference_type. Add MODE argument and invoke > build_reference_type_for_mode if MODE isn't VOIDmode. > (strip_typedefs): Use build_pointer_type_for_mode and > cp_build_reference_type_for_mode for pointers and references. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > PR c++/100281 > * g++.target/s390/pr100281-1.C: New test. > * g++.target/s390/pr100281-2.C: New test. > --- > gcc/cp/cvt.c | 2 +- > gcc/cp/tree.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----- > gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-1.C | 10 ++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-2.C | 9 +++++++ > 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-1.C > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-2.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/cvt.c b/gcc/cp/cvt.c > index f1687e804d1..7fa6e8df52b 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/cvt.c > +++ b/gcc/cp/cvt.c > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ cp_convert_to_pointer (tree type, tree expr, bool dofold, > { > if (TYPE_PRECISION (intype) == POINTER_SIZE) > return build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, type, expr); > - expr = cp_convert (c_common_type_for_size (POINTER_SIZE, 0), expr, > + expr = cp_convert (c_common_type_for_size (TYPE_PRECISION (type), 0), > expr, > complain); > /* Modes may be different but sizes should be the same. There > is supposed to be some integral type that is the same width > diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c > index a8bfd5fc053..3817b499e46 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/tree.c > +++ b/gcc/cp/tree.c > @@ -1201,12 +1201,14 @@ vla_type_p (tree t) > return false; > } > > -/* Return a reference type node referring to TO_TYPE. If RVAL is > + > +/* Return a reference type node of MODE referring to TO_TYPE. If MODE > + is VOIDmode the standard pointer mode will be picked. If RVAL is > true, return an rvalue reference type, otherwise return an lvalue > reference type. If a type node exists, reuse it, otherwise create > a new one. */ > tree > -cp_build_reference_type (tree to_type, bool rval) > +cp_build_reference_type_for_mode (tree to_type, machine_mode mode, bool rval) > { > tree lvalue_ref, t; > > @@ -1219,7 +1221,11 @@ cp_build_reference_type (tree to_type, bool rval) > to_type = TREE_TYPE (to_type); > } > > - lvalue_ref = build_reference_type (to_type); > + if (mode == VOIDmode) > + lvalue_ref = build_reference_type (to_type); > + else > + lvalue_ref = build_reference_type_for_mode (to_type, mode, false); > + > if (!rval) > return lvalue_ref; > > @@ -1245,7 +1251,7 @@ cp_build_reference_type (tree to_type, bool rval) > SET_TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY (t); > else if (TYPE_CANONICAL (to_type) != to_type) > TYPE_CANONICAL (t) > - = cp_build_reference_type (TYPE_CANONICAL (to_type), rval); > + = cp_build_reference_type_for_mode (TYPE_CANONICAL (to_type), mode, > rval); > else > TYPE_CANONICAL (t) = t; > > @@ -1255,6 +1261,16 @@ cp_build_reference_type (tree to_type, bool rval) > > } > > +/* Return a reference type node referring to TO_TYPE. If RVAL is > + true, return an rvalue reference type, otherwise return an lvalue > + reference type. If a type node exists, reuse it, otherwise create > + a new one. */ > +tree > +cp_build_reference_type (tree to_type, bool rval) > +{ > + return cp_build_reference_type_for_mode (to_type, VOIDmode, rval); > +} > + > /* Returns EXPR cast to rvalue reference type, like std::move. */ > > tree > @@ -1556,11 +1572,11 @@ strip_typedefs (tree t, bool *remove_attributes, > unsigned int flags) > { > case POINTER_TYPE: > type = strip_typedefs (TREE_TYPE (t), remove_attributes, flags); > - result = build_pointer_type (type); > + result = build_pointer_type_for_mode (type, TYPE_MODE (t), false); > break; > case REFERENCE_TYPE: > type = strip_typedefs (TREE_TYPE (t), remove_attributes, flags); > - result = cp_build_reference_type (type, TYPE_REF_IS_RVALUE (t)); > + result = cp_build_reference_type_for_mode (type, TYPE_MODE (t), > TYPE_REF_IS_RVALUE (t)); > break; > case OFFSET_TYPE: > t0 = strip_typedefs (TYPE_OFFSET_BASETYPE (t), remove_attributes, > flags); > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-1.C > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-1.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..b82e27b64e9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-1.C > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > +// PR C++/100281 > +// { dg-do compile } > + > +typedef void * __attribute__((mode (SI))) __ptr32_t; > + > +void foo () { > + unsigned int b = 100; > + __ptr32_t a; > + a = b; /* { dg-error "invalid conversion from 'unsigned int' to > '__ptr32_t'.*" } */ > +} > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-2.C > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-2.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..58552becd7c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/s390/pr100281-2.C > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > +// PR C++/100281 > +// { dg-do compile } > + > +typedef int & __attribute__((mode (SI))) __ref32_t; > + > +void foo () { > + unsigned int b = 100; > + __ref32_t a = b; /* { dg-error "cannot bind non-const lvalue reference of > type '__ref32_t'.*" } */ > +} >
Re: [PATCH 1/1] PR100281 C++: Fix SImode pointer handling
Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches Wed, 12 May 2021 01:35:41 -0700
- [PATCH 1/1] PR100281 C++: Fix SImode point... Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] PR100281 C++: Fix SIm... Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] PR100281 C++: Fix SIm... Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] PR100281 C++: ... Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] PR100281 C... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] PR1002... Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches