Hi! On 4/29/21 7:27 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: > I guess it depends on the scope of the PR? If it was about removing cc0, > then this patch would do. If it was about getting the generated code > also to be as close to what it was with cc0, then no, it cannot be closed.
I see. > OTOH, while the second patch (adjusting peepholes) does help, there are > other things in the pipeline - addition of new CC modes and enabling > compare elimination, adjusting rtx costs etc. I will continue to work on > them in my spare time and submit patches when ready. I would then suggest to get the second patch committed as well, then close the bug report and claim your bounty. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
