On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 2:41 PM Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
>
> This avoids use of valid_gimple_rhs_p and instead gimplifies to
> such a RHS, avoiding more SSA copies being generated by IVOPTs.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, queued for stage1
g:b26485f1af45423980b7bc1206411cf4b8bb84b6
> 2021-04-14 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
>
> * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr): Avoid
> valid_gimple_rhs_p by instead gimplifying to one.
> ---
> gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
> index 4012ae3f19d..12a8a49a307 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
> @@ -7286,12 +7286,13 @@ rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr (struct ivopts_data *data,
> }
>
> comp = fold_convert (type, comp);
> - if (!valid_gimple_rhs_p (comp)
> - || (gimple_code (use->stmt) != GIMPLE_PHI
> - /* We can't allow re-allocating the stmt as it might be pointed
> - to still. */
> - && (get_gimple_rhs_num_ops (TREE_CODE (comp))
> - >= gimple_num_ops (gsi_stmt (bsi)))))
> + comp = force_gimple_operand (comp, &seq, false, NULL);
> + gimple_seq_add_seq (&stmt_list, seq);
> + if (gimple_code (use->stmt) != GIMPLE_PHI
> + /* We can't allow re-allocating the stmt as it might be pointed
> + to still. */
> + && (get_gimple_rhs_num_ops (TREE_CODE (comp))
> + >= gimple_num_ops (gsi_stmt (bsi))))
> {
> comp = force_gimple_operand (comp, &seq, true, NULL);
> gimple_seq_add_seq (&stmt_list, seq);
> --
> 2.26.2
