On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:52:42PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/21/21 11:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to be consistent with tree-pretty-print.c on this
> > or perhaps just call dump_generic_node or whatever is used to dump
> > those e.g. for C?
>
> Yes, I'm going to install patch that does:
>
> + if (DECL_NAME (t))
>
> + pp_cxx_tree_identifier (pp, DECL_NAME (t));
>
> + else
>
> + dump_generic_node (pp, t, 0, TDF_SLIM, false);
Wouldn't flags | TDF_SLIM be better, so that it honors nouid etc.?
Jakub
