On 2021-03-23 9:07 a.m., Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 18:38, Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
Hi,
This patch causes regressions (116) on aarch64:
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle-asm.exp
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_bf16.c -std=gnu90 -O2
-fno-schedule-insns -DCHECK_ASM --save-temps -DTEST_FULL
check-function-bodies ld1ro_bf16_112
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_bf16.c -std=gnu90 -O2
-fno-schedule-insns -DCHECK_ASM --save-temps -DTEST_FULL
check-function-bodies ld1ro_bf16_16
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_bf16.c -std=gnu90 -O2
-fno-schedule-insns -DCHECK_ASM --save-temps -DTEST_FULL
check-function-bodies ld1ro_bf16_index
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_bf16.c -std=gnu90 -O2
-fno-schedule-insns -DCHECK_ASM --save-temps -DTEST_FULL
check-function-bodies ld1ro_bf16_m128
gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/asm/ld1ro_bf16.c -std=gnu90 -O2
-fno-schedule-insns -DCHECK_ASM --save-temps -DTEST_FULL
check-function-bodies ld1ro_bf16_m16
[....]
Not sure why you didn't see them during your testing?
Can you check?
Sorry, I've rerun (cd gcc && make check-gcc) on gcc114 for today trunk
and I don't see the regressions mentioned above.
Can you check this too and if I am doing something wrong for testing,
please point me out.
