On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 09:45 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > Identified by my check that compares documentation of params > with content of --help=param output. > > Pushed as obvious. > Martin
Thanks. Which check is this, BTW? (presumably this is something I should add to my patch testing workflow) Dave > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/invoke.texi: Add missing param documentation. > --- > gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > index 4a3c1e2fa0f..7a368959e5e 100644 > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > @@ -14362,6 +14362,10 @@ recurse deeper. > The maximum depth of a symbolic value, before approximating > the value as unknown. > > +@item analyzer-max-infeasible-edges > +The maximum number of infeasible edges to reject before declaring > +a diagnostic as infeasible. > + > @item gimple-fe-computed-hot-bb-threshold > The number of executions of a basic block which is considered hot. > The parameter is used only in GIMPLE FE.
