Dear Tobias, OK for trunk on both.
Thanks Paul On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: > First, I am looking for someone to review my patch at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-01/msg00241.html > > This patch contains two patches: > > a) Marking the polymorphic _copy function as pure. First, it helps with code > generation as the function is actually pure. Secondly, if one defines the > derived type in a PURE function, one currently gets an error as the impure > function _copy is called. > > b) We need to build a different class container type for coarrays - the > attached test case is an example why (missing diagnosis as the container > didn't have the coarray attribute). At the same time, I fixes the hash > function criterion. Since the polymorphic array patch, one some long module > + type names were cropped instead of triggering the hash mechanism, > increasing the chance for name collision. > > Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. > OK for the trunk? > > Tobias -- The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
