2012/1/31 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Ok, this variant keeps 16-byte alignment for thiscall-closure. > > It doesn't. You have to account for the fact that caller pushed return > address to the stack, so %esp was already decreased by 4 behind your > back. To maintain alignment, you have to decrease %esp by $12, not by > $16. > > Uros.
Ah, I got you. Right before call stack is aligned, in call we have unaligned return-address already on stack. I fix that Kai
