On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:31:51PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 11/03/21 16:27 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > That seems cleaner to me, rather than adding another variable with > > minor differences from the existing AM_CXXFLAGS. > > My specific concern is that AM_CXXFLAGS and AM_CXXFLAGS_LT will get > out of sync, i.e. we'll add something to the former and forget to add > it to the latter. > > If we keep using AM_CXXFLAGS but cancel out the -fvtable-verify=std > option, then there aren't two separate variables that can diverge. > > But I think it's too late in the gcc-11 process for that kind of > refactoring.
I think $(filter-out -fvtable-verify=std,$(AM_CXXFLAGS)) should be fairly simple thing if that is all that needs to be done. Jakub