As reported in the PR all powerpc64 targets fail

FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using 
SLP" 2

because like on arm we now vectorize 4 opportunities.  This adjusts
the testcase to follow the arm example.

compile-tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu, pushed.

2021-03-11  Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>

        PR testsuite/97494
        * gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c: Adjust for powerpc64*-*-*.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
index 117d65c5ddb..bf8f434dd50 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-21.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int main (void)
 
    Not all vect_perm targets support that, and it's a bit too specific to have
    its own effective-target selector, so we just test targets directly.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { 
target { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { 
target { vect_strided4 && { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* } } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { 
target { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc64*-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect" { 
target { vect_strided4 && { ! { aarch64*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc64*-*-* } } } } } 
} */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 0 "vect"  { 
target { ! { vect_strided4 } } } } } */
   
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to