See comment.
* gcc.target/cris/pr93372-1.c: Adjust expected assembler result
to allow an eliminated stack-frame.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/cris/pr93372-1.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/cris/pr93372-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/cris/pr93372-1.c
index 20aa65e8d59d..bc637302dfae 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/cris/pr93372-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/cris/pr93372-1.c
@@ -2,7 +2,16 @@
are filled. */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tnop" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tnop|addq 8,|subq 8," 2 } } */
+
+/* The reason for the weird variant of scan-assembler-not "\tnop" is that we
+ used to have an unused DWunion temp on stack in xlshrdi3 and delay-slots for
+ the conditional jumps filled by the addq 8/subq setting up that, but with a
+ MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE no longer 32, but the default 64, that stack-frame is
+ eliminated, but we no longer have eligible insns to fill the delay-slots.
+ Not wanting to tweak the code in the test-case, this is second best:
allowing
+ two nops -or- an addq 8 + subq 8 assuming code generation is otherwise
+ reasonably sane. */
void *f(void **p)
{
--
2.11.0
