On 3/5/21 1:04 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This makes tsubst_copy appropriately handle a variable template-id, which
in turn fixes tsubsting a COMPONENT_REF whose member operand is known at
parse time to be a variable template-id, as in the initialization of 'x'
in the first testcase.  Previously, we rejected this testcase with the
error "foo_t::bar<T> is not a function template", issued from
lookup_template_fuction.

We were already properly handling the analagous case where the object
operand of the COMPONENT_REF is dependent (and so the member operand is
a dependent template name), but there doesn't seems to be existing test
coverage for this, hence the second testcase below.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  Does this look OK
for trunk or perhaps GCC 12?

OK for trunk.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/96330
        * pt.c (tsubst_copy) <case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR>: Rename local
        variable 'fn' to 'tmpl'.  Handle a variable template-id by
        calling lookup_template_variable.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/96330
        * g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68a.C: New test.

Co-authored-by: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
---
  gcc/cp/pt.c                               |  9 ++++++---
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68.C  | 15 +++++++++++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68a.C | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68a.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index ec869451cd2..c956815ce85 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -17108,14 +17108,17 @@ tsubst_copy (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t 
complain, tree in_decl)
      case TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR:
        {
        /* Substituted template arguments */
-       tree fn = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
+       tree tmpl = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
        tree targs = TREE_OPERAND (t, 1);
- fn = tsubst_copy (fn, args, complain, in_decl);
+       tmpl = tsubst_copy (tmpl, args, complain, in_decl);
        if (targs)
          targs = tsubst_template_args (targs, args, complain, in_decl);
- return lookup_template_function (fn, targs);
+       if (variable_template_p (tmpl))
+         return lookup_template_variable (tmpl, targs);
+       else
+         return lookup_template_function (tmpl, targs);
        }
case TREE_LIST:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4c560d4bd35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/96330
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct foo_t {
+  template <class T> static constexpr bool bar = true;
+};
+constexpr foo_t foo{};
+
+template <class T>
+void f() {
+  int x = foo.bar<T>;
+  int y = foo_t::bar<T>;
+}
+
+template void f<int>();
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68a.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68a.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6091a03a004
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ68a.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/96330
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+template <class>
+struct foo_t {
+  template <class T> static constexpr bool bar = true;
+};
+template <class T> constexpr foo_t<T> foo{};
+
+template <class T>
+void f() {
+  int x = foo<T>.template bar<T>;
+  int y = foo_t<T>::template bar<T>;
+}
+
+template void f<int>();


Reply via email to