Hi!

As can be seen on:
#include <bit>

unsigned char f1 (unsigned char x, int y) { return std::rotl (x, y); }
unsigned char f2 (unsigned char x, int y) { return std::rotr (x, y); }
unsigned short f3 (unsigned short x, int y) { return std::rotl (x, y); }
unsigned short f4 (unsigned short x, int y) { return std::rotr (x, y); }
unsigned int f5 (unsigned int x, int y) { return std::rotl (x, y); }
unsigned int f6 (unsigned int x, int y) { return std::rotr (x, y); }
unsigned long int f7 (unsigned long int x, int y) { return std::rotl (x, y); }
unsigned long int f8 (unsigned long int x, int y) { return std::rotr (x, y); }
unsigned long long int f9 (unsigned long long int x, int y) { return std::rotl 
(x, y); }
unsigned long long int f10 (unsigned long long int x, int y) { return std::rotr 
(x, y); }
//unsigned __int128 f11 (unsigned __int128 x, int y) { return std::rotl (x, y); 
}
//unsigned __int128 f12 (unsigned __int128 x, int y) { return std::rotr (x, y); 
}

constexpr auto a = std::rotl (1234U, 0);
constexpr auto b = std::rotl (1234U, 5);
constexpr auto c = std::rotl (1234U, -5);
constexpr auto d = std::rotl (1234U, -__INT_MAX__ - 1);
the current <bit> definitions of std::__rot[lr] aren't pattern recognized
as rotates, they are too long/complex for that, starting with signed modulo,
special case for 0 and different cases for positive and negative.

For types with power of two bits the following patch adds definitions that
the compiler can pattern recognize and turn e.g. on x86_64 into ro[lr][bwlq]
instructions.  For weirdo types like unsigned __int20 etc. it keeps the
current definitions.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2021-03-05  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR libstdc++/99396
        * include/std/bit (__rotl, __rotr): Add optimized variants for power of
        two _Nd which the compiler can pattern match the rotates.

--- libstdc++-v3/include/std/bit.jj     2021-03-05 10:37:36.108378753 +0100
+++ libstdc++-v3/include/std/bit        2021-03-05 12:01:57.926310110 +0100
@@ -68,6 +68,14 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     __rotl(_Tp __x, int __s) noexcept
     {
       constexpr auto _Nd = __gnu_cxx::__int_traits<_Tp>::__digits;
+      if _GLIBCXX17_CONSTEXPR ((_Nd & (_Nd - 1)) == 0)
+       {
+         // Variant for power of two _Nd which the compiler can
+         // easily pattern match.
+         constexpr unsigned __uNd = _Nd;
+         const unsigned __r = __s;
+         return (__x << (__r % __uNd)) | (__x >> ((-__r) % __uNd));
+       }
       const int __r = __s % _Nd;
       if (__r == 0)
        return __x;
@@ -82,6 +90,14 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     __rotr(_Tp __x, int __s) noexcept
     {
       constexpr auto _Nd = __gnu_cxx::__int_traits<_Tp>::__digits;
+      if _GLIBCXX17_CONSTEXPR ((_Nd & (_Nd - 1)) == 0)
+       {
+         // Variant for power of two _Nd which the compiler can
+         // easily pattern match.
+         constexpr unsigned __uNd = _Nd;
+         const unsigned __r = __s;
+         return (__x >> (__r % __uNd)) | (__x << ((-__r) % __uNd));
+       }
       const int __r = __s % _Nd;
       if (__r == 0)
        return __x;

        Jakub

Reply via email to