On 2/24/21 10:11 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The outputs.exp tests check what temporary files are created
> and left behind with e.g. -save-temps.
>
> Additional files are created in presence of @file option.
> Adding an -I or -L option causes *another* temporary file to
> appear. I take it that's deliberate, as there are tests for
> that behavior.
>
> For native testing, the default test-framework baseboard
> file unix.exp doesn't add any -I or -L options and all tests
> pass. For a newlib target however, you'll have a couple of
> -L options (see the nopts handling in outputs.exp), leading
> to (cris-elf with --target_board=cris-sim):
>
> Running /x/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ...
> FAIL: outputs exe savetmp namedb: extra
> outputs.args.1
> FAIL: outputs exe savetmp named2: extra
> outputs.args.1
> FAIL: outputs exe savetmp named2: extra
> outputs.args.3
> FAIL: outputs lto sing unnamed: extra
> a.args.1
>
> The failing tests are among the actual tests that check the
> behavior of @file, and are confused by the additional -L.
>
> Identify presence of -I or -L from the test framework and
> skip those tests.
>
> Tested cris-elf and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Ok to commit?
>
> gcc/testsuite:
> * gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp: Skip @file -save-temps
> tests if target test-framework has -L or -I options.
OK
jeff
