On 02/03/2021 18:14, Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 02/03/2021 18:10, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 17:25, Richard Earnshaw
>> <richard.earns...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2021 16:19, Richard Earnshaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>> On 01/03/2021 15:26, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>>>> Ping?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 10:01, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ping?
>>>>>> I guess that's obvious enough?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 10:03, Christophe Lyon
>>>>>> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depending on how the toolchain is configured or how the testsuite is
>>>>>>> executed, -mthumb may not be compatible. Like for other tests, skip
>>>>>>> pr97969.c in this case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For instance arm-linux-gnueabihf and -march=armv5t in RUNTESTFLAGS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2021-01-27  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>>>>>> PR target/97969
>>>>>>> * gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c: Skip if thumb mode is not available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>>>>>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>>>>>> index 714a1d1..0b5d07f 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr97969.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>>>>>>  /* { dg-do compile } */
>>>>>>> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { arm_thumb1_ok || arm_thumb2_ok } } } */
>>>>>>>  /* { dg-options "-std=c99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mthumb -w -Os" } */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  typedef a[23];
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on a patch to make this sort of change unnecessary (I hope).
>>>>  Just running some final checks.
>>>>
>>>> R.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, wait.  This one already has an explicit -mthumb, so my patch won't
>>> affect this.  But why is -mthumb needed for this test anyway?  It's just
>>> a compilation test, so why not drop that and we'll generally get better
>>> coverage all round.
>>>
>>
>> For instance I see the test fail for target arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
>> --with-mode arm --with-cpu cortex-a9 --with-fpu vfp
>> and running the tests with -march=armv5t
>>
>> We get the famous thumb-1 + hard-float ABI not supported.
>>
>> I guess -mthumb is inherited from the bug report?
>>
>> Christophe
>>
> 
> dropping the -mthumb should fix that though?
> 
> In fact, I'd drop -Os as well, it's not needed as -Os is just one of the
> many options that are used to build this test already.
> 
> R.
> 

But maybe then we need to change dg-options into dg-add-options.

R.

Reply via email to