I don't know what it is that ix86, x86_64, Solaris and apparently CRIS has in common here.
According to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-February/652763.html m68k-unknown-linux-gnu is also in that bunch, but since there's a *-*-solaris* in the target specifier and also m68k vs. m68k*, I'm leaving the adjustment to a maintainer. gcc/testsuite: * gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90: CRIS error appears on line 5. --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 index da809a0d3b34..7d8c68d1d7c3 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ module m contains subroutine s - print *, (erfc) ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris* } } - end ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target { ! "i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris*" } } } + print *, (erfc) ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris* cris-*-* } } + end ! { dg-error "not a floating constant" "" { target { ! "i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* *-*-solaris* cris-*-*" } } } function erfc() end end -- 2.11.0
