On 27/01/21 21:42 +0100, Matthias Kretz wrote:
From: Matthias Kretz <kr...@kde.org>In many failure cases it is helpful to inspect the instructions leading up to the test failure. After this change the location is easier to find and the branch after failure is easier to find. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * testsuite/experimental/simd/tests/bits/verify.h (verify): Add instruction pointer data member. Ensure that the `if (m_failed)` branch is always inlined into the calling code. The body of the conditional can still be a function call. Move the get_ip call into the verify ctor to simplify the ctor calls. (COMPARE): Don't mention the use of all_of for reduction of a simd_mask. It only distracts from the real issue. --- .../experimental/simd/tests/bits/verify.h | 44 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/simd/tests/bits/verify.h b/ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/simd/tests/bits/verify.h
Several of these patches have been mangled by your mailer. The line above has been wrapped in the middle of the filename, making this an invalid patch header.
@@ -220,24 +223,21 @@ template <typename T> #define COMPARE(_a, _b) \
And all these lines ending with a backslash have been wrapped. I can easily fix the filename in the header, but my simplistic attempts to put this back together have failed. Could you please resend patch 13/16 as an attachment, not inline? I think the others are OK.
