On 01/28/2012 03:11 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > On 01/27/2012 11:02 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: >> If you all agree to remove ITM_REGPARM from libitm.h, then the tests on >> x86-32 will work. What is the status of this-- was there agreement on >> removing regparm? > > Note that I meant only for _ITM_beginTransaction. Indeed, regparm is ignored > with variadic functions. > See discussion here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00933.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00924.html
It's ignored. It's not actively wrong. I'm for leaving it alone, actually. r~
