On 1/28/21 10:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:04:12AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
We emit a bogus warning on the following testcase, suggesting that the
operator should return *this even when it does that already.
The problem is that normally cp_build_indirect_ref_1 ensures that *this
is folded as current_class_ref, but in templates (if return type is
non-dependent, otherwise check_return_expr doesn't check it) it didn't
go through cp_build_indirect_ref_1, but just built another INDIRECT_REF.

That seems like a bug in build_x_indirect_ref.

So do you want this instead (if it passes bootstrap/regtest)?

OK.

2021-01-28  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/98841
        * typeck.c (build_x_indirect_ref): For *this, return current_class_ref.

        * g++.dg/warn/effc5.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/typeck.c.jj  2021-01-27 11:48:49.715890458 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/typeck.c     2021-01-28 16:17:18.712755173 +0100
@@ -3326,7 +3326,15 @@ build_x_indirect_ref (location_t loc, tr
      {
        /* Retain the type if we know the operand is a pointer.  */
        if (TREE_TYPE (expr) && INDIRECT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
-       return build_min (INDIRECT_REF, TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (expr)), expr);
+       {
+         if (expr == current_class_ptr
+             || (TREE_CODE (expr) == NOP_EXPR
+                 && TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) == current_class_ptr
+                 && (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
+                       (TREE_TYPE (expr), TREE_TYPE (current_class_ptr)))))
+           return current_class_ref;
+         return build_min (INDIRECT_REF, TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (expr)), expr);
+       }
        if (type_dependent_expression_p (expr))
        return build_min_nt_loc (loc, INDIRECT_REF, expr);
        expr = build_non_dependent_expr (expr);
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/effc5.C.jj        2021-01-28 16:15:05.820256255 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/effc5.C   2021-01-28 16:15:05.820256255 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// PR c++/98841
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-Weffc++" }
+
+struct S {
+  template <typename T>
+  S& operator=(const T&) { return *this; }     // { dg-bogus "should return a 
reference to" }
+  S& operator=(const S&) { return *this; }
+};
+
+void
+foo ()
+{
+  S s, t;
+  s = 1;
+  s = t;
+}


        Jakub


Reply via email to