On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > Do you want expandargv altered alongs the lines you mention? Or a bug filed? > [in order for my patch to be acceptable]
The patch is OK as-is. Filing a bug for expandargv handling of missing files might be a good idea; it seems very arbitrary that @directory produces an error, but @file for a nonexistent file, or a file without read access, or a file with an I/O error on reading, gets passed through. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
