Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@bitrange.com> writes: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:50:56PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, John David Anglin wrote: >> > > The hppa target is a reload target and asm goto is not supported on >> > > reload targets. >> > > Skip failing tests on hppa. >> > >> > IIUC the preferred term is "IRA target" or maybe "non-LRA >> > target", as opposed to "LRA target". The tests fail for >> > cris-elf too, another IRA target, so I'd like to use that term >> > when adjusting the dg-skip-if, hope you don't mind. >> > >> > But also, I'd like to xfail it instead for cris-elf, which adds >> > a caveat: people might then think a "reload target" is not the >> > same as an "IRA target", what with the different adjustments. >> >> I think "IRA target" is not the right term, all targets are IRA targets, >> but only some are using LRA and others use the old reload. > > But, IRA isn't used when...
Not sure what was elided here, but the choices are IRA+reload, IRA+LRA, or no RA at all. FWIW, Dave's “reload target” sounded fine to me. It seems a bit more precise than “non-LRA target”, which if taken literally would include no-RA targets. > Whatever; LRA and non-LRA then. > I'll call the suggested testsuite target-supports predicate > "lra" (thanks Andreas S.; of course!), to be used negated here. Sounds good. Thanks, Richard
