On 1/19/21 12:37 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Right. From what I can tell at the moment, which is not much, the idea was to be able to load it even from a non-standard path and specify that path at configure time. If people think that is not useful and is actually harmful, I guess it can go.
And if I remember correctly, the dlopen approach was motivated by fact that we didn't want to have HSA runtime as a build dependency, but rather a run-time dependency. So it was done for packaging reasons. Martin
