maybe_instantiate_noexcept doesn't expect to see error_mark_node, so the new callsite I introduced in r11-6476 needs to be properly guarded.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/98659 * pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unification): Don't call maybe_instantiate_noexcept with error_mark_node. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/98659 * g++.dg/template/deduce8.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/pt.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/deduce8.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/deduce8.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c index 100c35f053c..83ecb0a2c3a 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -22382,7 +22382,7 @@ resolve_overloaded_unification (tree tparms, --function_depth; } - if (flag_noexcept_type) + if (flag_noexcept_type && fn != error_mark_node) maybe_instantiate_noexcept (fn, tf_none); elem = TREE_TYPE (fn); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/deduce8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/deduce8.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..430be426689 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/deduce8.C @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// PR c++/98659 +// { dg-do compile } + +template <bool> struct enable_if; +struct function { + template <typename _F> void operator=(_F); +}; +struct map { + function operator[](int); +}; +enum { E }; +template <typename> void foo (); +template <typename T> +typename enable_if<T::value>::type foo (); + +void +bar () +{ + map m; + m[E] = foo<int>; +} base-commit: 7d7ef413ef1b696dec2710ae0acc058bdc832686 -- 2.29.2